Economist and Freakonomics author Steven Levitt guest on the Colbert Report:
Freakonomics author Steven Levitt
December 9, 2006 1:30pm by Barry Ritholtz
This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment. The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client. References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others. The Compound Media, Inc., an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers Please see disclosures here: https://ritholtzwealth.com/blog-disclosures/
What's been said:
Discussions found on the web:Posted Under
Previous Post
Media Cliches as Sentiment “Tells”Next Post
Coming Soon: India ETF
By extension this explains why so many bloggers live with their Moms.
here is colberts “tribute to bloggers”
http://immobilienblasen.blogspot.com/search?q=colbert
An economist looks at what works in the real world and wonders if it works in theory…
Economics: the painful elaboration of the obvious.
Help me out people.
Is Colbert’s “nativity” set some sort of calculated subtle insult, or the height of trendy art? I’m too far removed from the cultural elite to hazard an imformed opinion.
p.s. Birth order DOES matter. But, so does name spelling — Charles, Chuck, and Charley are three very different people.
‘Is Colbert’s “nativity” set some sort of calculated subtle insult, or the height of trendy art?’
http://politicalhumor.about.com/od/funnyvideos/v/colbertwhca.htm
Jim. colbert is a Liberal who dies his show neo-con blackface. So for the Nativity scene, think of O’Reilly’s “War on christmas”. Colbert’s whole show is pretty much a send-up of O’Reilly only with Liberal/Progressive guests that Colbert lovingly skewers.
lol. that should be “does his show in neo-con blackface”
(never post in a dark room)