No Time to Waste . . .

Via Kate Wellings commentary at Weedon comes this delightful skewering of Hank Paulson’s understanding of the housing, market and credit crisis much earlier in its development:

 

"In short, any jot of credibility that
the Secretary may have had surely cannot withstand this
inarguable evidence of aberrant thinking; the inconsistency alone is
staggering. These quips run the full gamut from puerile denial to
deliberate understatement to bald-faced demagoguery, right on down to
yesterday’s call for patience. Suffocated by his unabashed,
unprincipled and incessant manure-spreading, I honestly wonder how the
heck it is that we are not on the WH lawn . right this instant .
pitchforks in hand.

>

 

April 20, 2007: ‘I don’t see (subprime mortgage market troubles) imposing a serious problem. I think it’s going to be largely contained.’

http://www.reuters.com/article/gc06/idUSWBT00686520070420

>

July 12, 2007: This is far and away the strongest global economy I’ve seen in my business lifetime.’

http://money.cnn.com/2007/07/18/news/economy/powerplay_economy.fortune/index.htm

> 

August 1, 2007:
‘The market has focused on this. There’s a wake-up call, and there’s an
adjustment to this repricing of risk, but I see the underlying economy
as being very healthy.’

http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSBJC00005820070801

>

 

February 28, 2008: ‘I’m
seeing a series of ideas suggested involving major government
intervention in the housing market and these things are usually
presented or sold as a way of helping homeowners stay in their homes.
Then when you look at them more carefully what they really amount to is
a bailout for financial institutions or Wall Street.’
http://blogs.wsj.com/deals/2008/02/28/ 


>

March 16, 2008:
‘We’ve got strong financial institutions . . . Our markets are the envy
of the world. They’re resilient, they’re…innovative, they’re
flexible. I think we move very quickly to address situations in this
country, and, as I said, our financial institutions are strong.’

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/03/secretary_paulson_on_fox_news.html

>


May 7, 2008: ‘The worst is likely to be behind us. .There’s no doubt that things feel better today, by alot, than they did in March.’ http://www.forbes.com/markets/feeds/afx/2008/05/07/afx4978703.html

>

 

May 16, 2008: ‘The
fiscal stimulus will provide support to the economy as we weather the
housing correction, capital markets turmoil and higher energy and food
prices. .Although we are still working through housing and capital
markets issues, and expect to be doing so for some time, we also expect
to see a faster pace of economic growth before the end of the year. .In
my judgment, we are closer to the end of the market turmoil than the
beginning. Looking forward, I expect that financial markets will be
driven less by the recent turmoil and more by broader economic
conditions and, specifically, by the recovery of the housing sector.’

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/05/16/business/main4103698.shtml

>

July 15, 2008: ‘If
you’ve got a squirt gun in your pocket, you may have to take it out. –
If you’ve got a bazooka, and people know you’ve got it…you’re not
likely to take it out.’

http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fpcomment/archive/2008/07/16/henry-paulson-s-bazookanomics.aspx


>

July 20, 2008: ‘I
think it’s going to be months that we’re working our way through this
period, clearly months. .Of course the list [of difficulties] is going
to grow longer given the stresses we have in the marketplace, given the
housing correction – but again, it’s a safe banking system, a sound
banking system. Our regulators are on top of it. This is a very
manageable situation.’
http://cbs5.com/national/henry.paulson.economy.2.775329.html


>

August 10, 2008: ‘We have no plans to insert money into either of those two institutions [FNM and FRE].’

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aULVZ2mAF9es&

>

 

September 7, 2008:
‘In July, Congress granted the Treasury, the Federal Reserve and FHFA
new authorities with respect to the GSEs, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Since that time, we have closely monitored financial market and
business conditions and have analyzed in great detail the current
financial condition of the GSEs – including the ability of the GSEs to
weather a variety of market conditions going forward. As a result of
this work, we have determined that it is necessary to take action. .
Based on what we have learned about these institutions over the last
four weeks – including what we learned about their capital requirements
– and given the condition of financial markets today, I concluded that
it would not have been in the best interest of the taxpayers for
Treasury to simply make an equity investment in these enterprises in
their current form.’ .

http://www.ustreas.gov/press/releases/hp1129.htm

 

>

September 15, 2008: Moral
hazard is something I don’t take lightly. . I never once considered
that it was appropriate to put taxpayer money on the line in resolving
Lehman Brothers.’

http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2008/09/15/business/NA-US-Paulson-Markets.php

>

September 19, 2008: ‘We’re
talking hundreds of billions of dollars – this needs to be big enough
to make a real difference and get at the heart of the problem. This is
the way we stabilize the system. . If these efforts result in a net
cost to the taxpayer, it’s a better bet than the alternative. . I am
convinced that this bold approach will cost American families far less
than the alternative – a continuing series of financial institution
failures and frozen credit markets unable to fund economic expansion.’ .

http://money.cnn.com/2008/09/19/news/economy/paulson_plan_cost/index.htm

 

>

September 23, 2008: We
need to work as quickly as possible; we need to get something done. We
believe that our plan, and the plan that we developed with
congressional leaders and worked so hard, is a plan that works. And we
need a plan that works.’ .

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=arQOMRk_d_s0&

 

>

October 8, 2008: ‘We
have no time to waste in implementing the new law. . One thing we must
recognize – even with the new Treasury authorities, some financial
institutions will fail. . But patience is also needed because the
turmoil will not end quickly and significant challenges remain ahead. .
Neither passage of this new law nor the implementation of these
initiatives will bring an immediate end to current difficulties.’ ."

http://www.treas.gov/press/releases/hp1189.htm

>

>


Source:
Welling @ Weedon
Oct. 9, 2008
http://welling.weedenco.com/index.cfm?act=Newsletter.cfm&category=acuteobservations&newsletterid=3314&menugroup=Home

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web:

Posted Under

Uncategorized