So, a general question (meant entirely honestly): why do we separate pension, employment insurance, government employee pension and other “state” investment funds from sovereign wealth funds? Is there something fundamentally different about these?
In a broader interpretation, some of the largest investment funds in the world are state or quasi-state, and I’m not sure the distinction between these and “sovereign wealth funds” is truly meaningful.
So, a general question (meant entirely honestly): why do we separate pension, employment insurance, government employee pension and other “state” investment funds from sovereign wealth funds? Is there something fundamentally different about these?
In a broader interpretation, some of the largest investment funds in the world are state or quasi-state, and I’m not sure the distinction between these and “sovereign wealth funds” is truly meaningful.
I did not realize Alberta was sovereign.
Or Alaska.
You’ve reposted several things in the last week. This and the cartoon of the bull with the different cuts of meat. Is there a reason for it?