The 7 yr note auction was good as the yield at 3.078% was about 1-2 bps below the when issued and the bid to cover at 2.98 is the highest since this maturity was reintroduced in Feb ’09. The average since then is 2.59. The fly continues to be the very high level of direct bidders which totaled 17.2% with indirect bidders chipping in 40.3% of the auction. 17.2% is so far above normal (has only been in double digits once before and was running 2-8% most of last year) that it is really distorting the color on who is buying as buyers avoid the dealer community in placing bids and go direct to the Treasury instead. This influence is possibly skewing the pricing as dealers don’t have as much transparency of the market.
7 year note auction was excellent but who is buying?
February 25, 2010 2:30pm by
This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment. The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client. References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others. The Compound Media, Inc., an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers Please see disclosures here: https://ritholtzwealth.com/blog-disclosures/
Posted Under
UncategorizedPrevious Post
Durable Goods: Less Than It SeemsNext Post
News Hub: Wall Street Blogs to Watch
What's been said:
Discussions found on the web: