Fed Pres Fisher, the 3rd member to dissent against the Aug 9 FOMC decision, today is also the 3rd to give their reason for it. After cutting the fed funds rate from 5.25% to basically zero, cutting the discount rate spread from 100 bps to 50bps and expanding their balance sheet from $900b to $2.9T by buying MBS, Agency debt and US Treasuries, Fisher finally said enough is enough and didn’t want to put a date on the length of the zero rate policy. On the economy, he thinks “nonmonetary factors, not monetary policy, are retarding the willingness and ability of job creators to put to work the liquidity that we have provided…Those with the capacity to hire American workers are immobilized. Not because they lack entrepreneurial zeal or do not wish to grow; not because they can’t access cheap and available credit. Rather, they simply cannot budget or manage for the uncertainty of fiscal and regulatory policy.” He also blames the debt ceiling debacle as creating major hesitancy on the part of business to do business. “What is restraining our economy is not monetary policy but fiscal misfeasance in Washington…Pointing fingers at the Fed only diminishes credibility.” While I agree with Fisher’s points on fiscal and regulatory policy, deflecting criticism AWAY from the Fed only diminishes his credibility.
Fisher gives reason for his dissent
August 17, 2011 2:02pm by
This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment. The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client. References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others. The Compound Media, Inc., an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers Please see disclosures here: https://ritholtzwealth.com/blog-disclosures/
Posted Under
UncategorizedPrevious Post
The Aftermath of the Housing BubbleNext Post
Land of the Free, Home of the Poor?
What's been said:
Discussions found on the web: