April Payrolls rose 115k, 45k less than expected BUT the prior two months were revised up by 53k and considering the weather issues, its best to average the months and thus things are about in line. The private sector added 130k jobs vs the estimate of 165k but last month alone was revised up by 45k. The unemployment rate ticked down to 8.1% but for the wrong reason as Household employment fell by 169k, more than offset by a 342k decline in the size of the labor force. The participation rate fell to 63.6%, the lowest since 1981. Encouragingly, the avg duration of unemployment fell to 39.1 weeks from 39.4 weeks, the lowest in a year. Discouragingly for many, avg hourly earnings were flat m/o/m and the y/o/y gain of 1.8% is well below CPI running at 2.7%. The avg workweek was unchanged at 34.5 hours. Mfr’g added 16k jobs, 4k less than expected but the prior month was revised up by 4k. Construction fell slightly and Retail saw job gains after the two previous months of declines. Temp help rose by 21k. While the Federal Govt added 10k workers including 8k more in the Post Office (which makes little sense), local gov’ts shed a net 11k jobs, led by a drop in education. Bottom line, the muted market response to the weak headline # was due to the offset from the upward revisions in the two prior months, leading to an in line figure taken together. This said and as I’ve been saying, the data isn’t strong enough to get excited and not weak enough to get the Fed to think they need to do more right now, a no man’s land that will keep a lid on stocks for the time being.
With revisions, jobs in line/No man’s land
May 4, 2012 8:02am by
This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment. The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client. References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others. The Compound Media, Inc., an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers Please see disclosures here: https://ritholtzwealth.com/blog-disclosures/
Posted Under
UncategorizedPrevious Post
Wise Up to the Proper Flaws of Monthly NFP Data
What's been said:
Discussions found on the web: