Market Marxists
March 1, 2006 8:45am by Barry Ritholtz
This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment. The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client. References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others. The Compound Media, Inc., an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers Please see disclosures here: https://ritholtzwealth.com/blog-disclosures/
What's been said:
Discussions found on the web:Posted Under
Previous Post
Existing Home Sales Slip 5th Consec MonthNext Post
Google, or something else?
Think that the cartoon rings true in many professions, especially those dominated by graduates of the Ivy/Ivy-equivalents (ex business schools, which I get the impression are much more right than the other professional schools).
Speaking as a graduate of two Ivy-equivalent schools for BA/JD, most people in my circle are center-left, lefties who set out to Wall Street, white shoe law firms, McKinsey, etc. despite reading about the evil struggle between the capital class and the proletariet simply because the money was too good to pass up.
Faustian bargin indeed.
John,
Yours is a sad comment on the quality of Ivy league education. That you all turn out left-wingers who feel you are making a Faustian bargain. Sad.
No one taught you the beauty of true capitalism. Granted ours is pretty corrupted by a cancerous gov’t whose tentacles are so pervasive as to go unnoticed. Still we’ve inherited a great treasure we don’t understand & therefore are slowly destroying.
There is not a more moral or productive system of interaction than voluntary exchange, to wit capitalism.
America, what a country! It will be the last refuge on Earth for Marxists. No where else can Marxists be so completetly insulated from the true horror of Marxism.
Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, And throw in a few Marxists who long for the kind of Marxist utopia the others are fleeing.
– Statue of Liberty (revised)
I have a brother who, incredulous, asked/expleted: “You think that’s funny!?!” to my amusement at a Doonesbury clip.
I wasn’t sure if he was going to get the baseball bat to finish me off.
Allow me to speculate: Is it because Marx was, at heart, a successful marketer of political economy who found the desk job more satisfying than getting into those dirty trenches?
No.
Ok, is it the squeak of the mouse announcing tentatively (“I suppose”), that he is, contrary to gnawing opinion, (“at heart”), a man, with deceptively deep intellectual sophistication? (Marx –who would surely be amused.)
algernon – to define capitalism as a system of voluntary exchange is quite incomplete since it fails to account for relations of Production/REproduction. The voluntary exchange of labor-power for a wage is correct so far as it goes, so long as economic coercion is imagined away, just as is history in an exchange-centred definition.
Beneath the surface of ‘the voluntary’ lurks another reality of surplus value creation and unpaid labor. Of course, the overt objectivity of this had to be and was countered by the multitude of subjectivisms, aka neoclassic theories.
Max – The true horror of Marxism is a fine but meaningless phrase unless referring to what was developed in the various ‘communist’ (i.e. state capitalist) social formations, in which case we might want to speak of Stalinism, while considering the question of why so-called free market capitalism has so often had to rely on state initiative and support.
I at least have generally found it interesting that most Marxists, and more so those who pretend to critique, have never read what Marx wrote, or never more than fragments, and usually as interpreted by others.
The cartoon, though, does catch the opportunistic radicalism or would that be radical opportunism of a 1960s generation ‘gone bad’.
Very good blog, thanks.
Thanks.
Marx was no fool, that’s for sure. The only fools are those that simply dismiss Marx outright because of all the failed totalitarians that called themselves Marxist. As Juan points out, the two are very different things.
I think Barry must like this picture because in some alternative universe he can see himself sitting in that chair muttering those words.
It is the irony of the picture that makes us laugh.
Didn’t Michael from _Stranger in a Strange Land_ say something to the effect that all humor was based on something that was “wrongful”? Either the Marxist is doing a wrongful thing, or being a stock trader is a wrongful thing, depending on whether you are a capitalist (in the meaning of “someone who rents capital”) or whether you are a Marxist (in the meaning of one who thinks “labor-power” has a useful meaning). Sweet!
Of course, if you are a capitalist, in the meaning of “one who thinks that laissez-faire is the best policy,” then neither of these is wrongful. Be what you want, do what you want, just so long as you don’t violate the symmetrical rights of others. That’s why we have so many Marxists in high places in the world’s most supposedly capitalist country. What is wrongful is the vast number of Marxists pointing at the vast numbers of communist dictators and saying, “but that’s not what we meant!” Too bad Marx never wrote much about what is to be done and left that to interpretation. If he had, he and his intellectual followers might have realized that the alternatives to capitalism were no better. Capitalism is the least worst system.
Juan, in no mood for fun, ecapsulates (only for some) [calmo, a scholar of not only Marx but Hegel is ready for the intellectual cocksmanship] the core of Das Kapital for our edification setting the Marxists-at-heart straight.
The cartoon is good but Juan is better.
Why Academics Don’t Like Working on Wall Street
From The Wall Street Journal ### Was this helpful? Do comment. Consider a free eMail subscription for this site. Thank you (foot)notes: Hat tip for the file from Big Picture….
Why Academics Don’t Like Working on Wall Street
From The Wall Street Journal ### Was this helpful? Do comment. Consider a free eMail subscription for this site. Thank you (foot)notes: Hat tip for the file from Big Picture….