The new “World Wealth Report” for 2015 was released last week fromCap Gemini and RBC Wealth Management. The focus is on the population of high net worth individuals, or HNWIs as the report calls them. The report, based on a survey of more than 5,100 wealthy people in 23 major markets, is packed with fascinating data and graphics.
You are probably familiar with some of the key themes and findings:
• Tremendous amounts of wealth have been accumulated during the past five years.
• Much of this wealth is concentrated in the top 1 percent; and a large share of that wealth is concentrated in the top 1 percent of the 1 percent.
• The very wealthy have a disproportionate impact on policy, investing and the economy.
No big surprises there. However, some of the specific data points were intriguing:
— The global HNWI population is 14.65 million, with total wealth of $56.4 trillion.
— The U.S. HNWI population is 4.68 million, with total wealth of $16.23 trillion.
— The U.S. as a region is ranked first for HNWI wealth and second for HNWI population, behind the Asia-Pacific region.
Here are a few other points worth considering:
Asia rising: Asia-Pacific overtook North America to become the region with the largest HNWI population at 4.69 million. While the two regions have swapped leadership roles before, the report notes that the growth of the Asia-Pacific region is more of a structural shift than in the past. That implies it is more likely to retain its leadership over the U.S. in terms of the number of wealthy individuals. Asia-Pacific is also likely to surpass North America in total wealth by the end of this year.
HNWI wealth expanded in Asia-Pacific somewhat more slowly (6.7 percent) than in North America (7.2 percent) in 2014. These were the second-slowest rates of growth during the past five years. These two regions were the only ones that outpaced their five-year (2009 to 2014) annualized growth rates of wealth held by the richest people.
Interestingly, India was the fastest-growing market for wealthy individuals in 2014, climbing 26 percent, and jumping five places to rank 11th globally.
Ultra-HNWIs: The 1 percent of the 1 percent now account for 35 percent of the wealth held by the richest people.
Wealth grew even more concentrated last year. Just two nations, the U.S. and China, helped drive more than half the global population growth of the wealthiest people; the next 10 markets expanded by less than the global average.
Perhaps the most significant data point regarding global wealth is the forecast: Wealth held by the richest people will rise 7.7 percent a year to $70 trillion by 2017.
Investments: Perhaps the most significant news is that the wealthy now have more capital invested in stocks than any other asset class. The report notes that “equity allocations moved slightly ahead of cash as the dominant asset” in the portfolios of the rich. Wealthy Japanese and Latin Americans increased their equity holdings the most. Note that this is based on surveys, not actual portfolio data.
It is intriguing to consider that despite the strong rally in equities — especially in the U.S. since 2009 and in China since 2014 — cash was still the top holding a year earlier. It is unclear if the increase in equity holdings came about through an increased allocation to stocks or through appreciation. I suspect it may be the latter.
The disproportionate amount of cash is intriguing as well. The top two reasons respondents gave for holding so much cash were 1) as a hedge in case of market volatility and 2) lifestyle needs. This suggests the scars from the financial crisis linger, but that the willingness of the rich to spend on luxury goods won’t end.
Finally, the disproportionate impact the 1 percent has on just about everything is something to keep in mind. If you want to better understand much of what is going on — from policy to investing to the economy — what the wealthiest investors do tells us a lot about where the world is headed.
Originally published as: How Rich Are the Rich?
Where else are they putting their money? Every time I see your “Classic Driver” posts about a 6 figure 1960’s Jag, for example…
huh … maybe they ought to put it in to solving problems. You know, like the accelerating collapse of ecological processes and biological resources.
http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/1/5/e1400253.full.pdf+html?
“Only when the last tree has been cut down; Only when the last river has been poisoned; Only when the last fish has been caught; Only then will you find that money cannot be eaten.”
It’s just a thought. On the other hand, maybe the view from the ivory tower (now with hydroponic salad bar!) will be too fun to ignore.
Ehrlich’s Population Bomb predictions were way wrong…
http://www.nationalreview.com/human-exceptionalism/420082/paul-ehrlich-still-pushing-ecological-doomsday-wesley-j-smith
Maybe Ehrlich’s friends who co-wrote the paper you posted will do much better with their doomsday predictions.
At first glance, I see nothing in there that refutes Mr. Piketty’s observations, assertions…or fears.
A large amount of it is being used to buy politicians, to protect the wealth.
Beyond that real estate, art, antiques, cars, planes, trust funds for the TFKs, and etc.
Until the Supreme Court’s assertion that ~bribery is free speech~ (“Money is free speech”) can be challenged as to force the SCOTUS to define “bribery” as stated in the Constitution, Democracy is history, elected officials are puppets to the wealthiest sponsors.
As with 2008, by the time it’s obvious enough for public outcry, it’s already too late, the objective is to pacify the masses with just enough income to afford payment on loans made from the confiscated wealth of those masses.
In short, we’re screwed.