Its Fed Day, part 1. Start it right with our hand curated morning train reads:
• The Doomsayer’s Guide to the Fed, Rates and What Could Go Wrong (Bloomberg) but see Don’t Worry Too Much About A Fed Interest Rate Hike (fivethirtyeight)
• You’re not irrational, you’re just quantum probabilistic: Researchers explain human decision-making with physics theory (Science Daily)
• Remembering 2008: It Could Have Been Another Depression (Conversable Economist)
• Wall Street’s latest panic: Trump could win (Politico)
• ‘Syria is emptying’ (Washington Post) see also Scenes From a Human Flood (NYT)
disconnect between low rates and low incomes?
http://www.ibtimes.com/fed-rate-hike-why-seven-years-near-zero-interest-rates-failed-boost-wages-2098447
and low sales?
A Trump victory only worries wall street because rents would be higher. Jeb? otoh doesn’t worry wall street at all.
How Jeb Bush’s Tax Cuts Suckered the Media
If you have heard about Jeb Bush’s new tax plan by reading political reporters, you have probably heard that it is a “proposal to reform the tax code” that will “crack down on hedge fund managers” (CNN), that it is “mainstream and ordinary” with “a populist note” (NPR), that it “challenged some long-held tenets of conservative tax policy” (the New York Times), and has “a nod to the populist anger roiling both parties” (The Wall Street Journal). It is, in other words, the same sort of coverage George W. Bush received when he unveiled his tax cuts in 1999, …
NB: I tend to side with the opinion that the bulk of corporate media and political reportage these days isn’t so much suckered as doing their job which unfortunately now seems to emphasize stenography, journaminimalism and bamboozling readers.
Trump is Copying Reagan, Almost Exactly.
”..Whatever else happens during the Republican debate at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library, one thing is certain: Candidates will claim to be like America’s 40th president. The competition to show who most resembles Reagan has become a ritualized part of the GOP-nominating process. Many people have drawn comparisons between the man known as The Donald and the man never known as The Ronald—starting with Trump himself, who adapted Reagan’s 1980 slogan “Let’s make America great again.” Like Reagan, Trump is a former Democrat and a one-time TV star, whom the media initially dismissed as having little chance of reaching the White House…”
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/09/donald-trump-is-reagans-heir/405484/
If only there would be similar competition in the Democratic Party with candidates fighting over the mantle of FDR. Only one candidate is remotely like him and it’s not the true Queen from the house of the DLC.
If only why? FDR was great for his time but the GOP made sure we’d have no more FDRs who unlike Reagan really won a war.
The Trump Reagan comparison is really pissing off the nuts
While the mainstream car industry has been focused on how to make an ignition switch for $2.00 instead of $2.20, Google has focused on re-inventing the industry. Between Google and Tesla, it is likely the car industry will be utterly transformed in the next 20 years. Once Apple gets into the mix, then there will be real competition for 21st century. Having bought two new vehicles recently (mid-priced, not high end), it is pretty clear that the car industry has largely been ignoring the tech revolution outside of making engines and transmissions run more efficiently. I think the entire industry is ripe to have done to it, what the Japanese car companies did to the US automakers in the 80s.
http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2015-09-15/google-s-self-driving-toaster-finally-rattles-automakers
well as the old saw went back when Bill Gates was pushing for this, the car companies shot back, if cars ran like computers did, we would be ok with cars shutting down without warning (in windows case the blue screen of death). but have the technology companies had an impact? or yes they have. should the car companies have just out sourced some of that to them instead of doing it themselves? maybe. after all, they have had all sorts of starts and crashes along the way (the BMW Idrive any one?). but then again, the interior of the car and the experience in it, have become a lot more important than it was in the past, and if they all did that, all cars would be alike on the inside. would that have been better? not so sure, check with the phone companies, how well has that worked out when they all have the same phones? they actually have always been sensitive to parts pricing, its just not been all that well known till now. remember the old saw about the fighter plane being used by the air force being built by the lowest bidder? thats been true in cars, and just about all manufacturers every where (and that drove a lot of manufacturing else where, along with a lot of technology in building products, those computerized machines, that we now depend on to make just about every thing). but Tesla is pushing car electrification, which in the long run, is whee the car is going , along with using hydrogen as a fuel. so they pushed car companies to do more than just PR stunts (not that it has stopped that mind you, they still do them). and while a longer term automation project that Google is working, its likely we will see that happen. but its going to be a while.
Death of a car salesman
No one much likes car dealers. But changing the system will be hard
Aug 22nd 2015 | From the print edition
THE internet was supposed to do away with all sorts of middlemen. Yet house sales are mostly conducted by estate agents, and car sales are still finalised in cavernous showrooms that smell of tyres. Technology is diminishing the role of car dealers, however. Customers are using the internet for much of the process of choosing a new car, and are increasingly getting loans and insurance online rather than buying them from the dealer who sells them their car. Some carmakers are seeking ways to bypass dealers too.
In the motor industry’s early days, a century ago, manufacturers tried selling their vehicles at the factory gate, in shops they owned themselves, by mail order and through travelling salesmen. But eventually they settled on a system of franchising, in which independent dealers mostly sell just one maker’s models. Now, almost all of the 90m motor vehicles sold worldwide each year cross dealers’ forecourts. In America, the second-largest car market, their total revenues reached $806 billion in 2014. China’s car market, the largest, has rapidly come to resemble the West’s, with all its faults (see article).
…
http://www.economist.com/news/business/21661656-no-one-much-likes-car-dealers-changing-system-will-be-hard-death-car-salesman
Once Apple is in the mix, traffic will be thinner as ordinary people will no longer be able to afford cars. However, yuppies will sit in line overnight to buy the latest Apple car with Dad’s credit card.
Does this mean you shouldn’t let finance people be around your children unsupervised?
http://www.businessinsider.com/blankfein-compared-finance-to-the-catholic-church-2015-9
Oh yes! And for the same reason!
kitchen of the future
http://www.eater.com/2015/9/15/9326775/the-kitchen-of-the-future-has-failed-us
more about the present than the future?
lets bang our heads against the wall again?
http://economistsview.typepad.com/economistsview/2015/09/collecting-taxes-is-government-work.html
we have tied to use debt collectors before. all it did was increase costs as the private companies used thug tactics to try to bully tax payers into paying. leading to increased cost at the IRS to deal with complaints and costs of complying with court orders that inevitably show up. it also encourages tax payer abuse, and we have tried it twice so far, and its failed every time.
a floating power plant ?
http://news.yahoo.com/hawaii-taps-ocean-generate-carbon-free-power-190835036.html
and it doesnt pollute?
Queen Elizabeth Buys $1.575M Condo in Downtown Chicago
http://chicago.curbed.com/archives/2015/09/16/queen-elizabeth-buys-in-chicago.php
Why Americans Still Think the Economy Is Terrible
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/17/upshot/why-americans-still-think-the-economy-is-terrible.html
Because the Republicans tell them so.
Just like they tell them that infrastructure spending is not worth it if it gives Obama a win, same with the Iran Nuke deal, same with budgets.
GOP voters are simply dumb. Look at what they crave tonight.
Because their kids have no jobs? Because they have forgotten what a raise or a COLA is? Because the government tells us that inflation is down in August because of lower gas prices while rent and food increased?
“No jobs”. ROFL!
Gotta love the statline from Ima.
I know not your headline, but “More Americans Have Been Shot to Death in the Last 25 Years Than Have Died in Every War ” mislead me a little. I thought they meant all casualties in Every war, not just American casualties. I think we often get a distorted view of WWI, WWII, even Vietnam based on thinking about American deaths only. If you think about all deaths in WWII compared to US gun violence, you get a much different picture than American deaths in WWII. We probably are the only country with this distinction though.
US News & world report once editorialized that the USA dropped more tonnage of bombs on Iraq than were dropped by all sides during the entirety of WW II. Considering the Blitz, the bombing of Germany and Japan, the Japanese bombing of China, I thought that was a pretty impressive statistic.
This is not only misleading but it is wrong. More Americans died in the civil war than any other war and it ignores this number.
http://www.civilwar.org/education/history/faq
This is divisive political B.S.!
Uneven recovery?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/census-data-poverty-income_55f981d5e4b0e333e54c00ea
Census Bureau adds a supplemental measure of poverty.
http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2015/09/americas-poverty-problem/405700/
Perhaps this is why, living Wage vs minimum wage on a county level..
http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2015/09/living-wage-calculator-interactive-minimum-wage/404569/
now that was weird i was logged in about to submit a comment when was logged off
you cant beat the market. emh all that you know
http://www.pragcap.com/three-things-i-think-i-think-stupid-markets-edition/
course not, you start out being down about 30% (from fees, etc, and taxes) before you even start.
so maybe Medicare for all might be really expensive (based on a probably cherry picked estimate using numbers from who knows where) but should we really be looking to see how much better of we all would be? and is this cost argument just a way to make sure only some have health care?
http://baselinescenario.com/2015/09/16/bernie-sanders-wants-to-spend-18-trillion-so-what/
while we have more jobs now, its not like poverty has improved
http://fivethirtyeight.com/datalab/more-jobs-havent-meant-less-poverty/
nor has it put more money in the 99% hands. so far incomes have been stagnant for 3 years running. and its not like the so called good times were much better than being stagnant, and what little gains there were wiped out by the lesser depression.
The US is taking another step towards becoming a First World country again in a couple of weeks.
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/the-us-is-about-to-drop-world-war-ii-payment-card-technology-2015-09-16
If the banks say it’s OK, I guess it is