In celebration (if thats the right word) of today’s Fed announcement (2:15pm EST), I thought I would share this puff piece found in this Sunday’s Newsday.
Answering a Need for Analysis
“When there is a question about the condition of the U.S. economy or where it is headed, the occupation most often quoted in the media is the economist. But what do economists actually do, and is it a good career choice?Economists are found in all facets of government and business. That is because they not only study the macro conditions that make our economy work and make predictions, they also study the micro elements of business and make projections. The Department of Labor estimates that the number of economists in the United States is approaching 150,000. In the next 10 years, employment is projected to grow between 21 and 35 percent.
You’ll be in good company: Among the nation’s most prominent economists are Steve Friedman, chief economic adviser to President George W. Bush; Robert Reich, who played a similar role in the Clinton administration, and Alan Greenspan, chairman of the Federal Reserve.
So what would you actually do? Government officials and corporate boards often depend on the information provided by economists in their decision making. The nation’s monetary policy is formulated by the information given by some of the best economic minds in the country. Without accurate data, the conclusions that go with it and the actions taken, the nation’s economy as well as the world’s economy would collapse.
Federal, state and local governments rely on their work. They may be involved in education, labor, international trade, transportation or even the lottery. However, most are directly concerned with the practical applications. Banks, insurance companies, security firms, pharmaceutical companies, hospitals, transportation companies and virtually every type of business hire economists.
So, yes, the job is crucial and influential. But you have to like numbers and analysis, and you have to be able to put up with being wrong a lot. Economics is sometimes more of an art, and even some of its biggest fans refer to it as “the dismal science.”
Sources:
Answering a Need for Analysis
SCRIPPS HOWARD NEWS SERVICE
Newsday, January 25, 2004
http://www.newsday.com/business/local/newyork/ny-econ3640970jan25,0,5597187.story
Federal Reserve News and Events
http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents.htm
Re: Economists Wanted
” The nation’s monetary policy is formulated by the information given by some of the best economic minds in the country. Without accurate data, the conclusions that go with it and the actions taken, the nation’s economy as well as the world’s economy would collapse. ”
COLLAPSE ?!?!
I can hardly believe someone ever WROTE that statement.. and that you actually re-printed it.
It was meant as a joke wasn’t it? Come’on .. admit it. :)
Of course!
Its a puff piece, filled with such self serious bon mots like that, how could I not (And that was BEFORE I knew the fed was going to whack the market!)
Without accurate data — well, we’d probably have less government intervention and/or manipulation.
The biggest joke is that phrase “accurate” data — many informed observers believe the data is at best “massaged,” and at worst completely falsified (I’m in the former category)/ Look at the regular “revisions” to employment, and the (failed) attempt to kill the layoff data