Would a Gold Standard Brighten Economic Outcomes?
January 26, 2015 5:00am by
This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment. The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client. References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others. The Compound Media, Inc., an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers Please see disclosures here: https://ritholtzwealth.com/blog-disclosures/
What's been said:
Discussions found on the web:Posted Under
Previous Post
Vermont High Schoolers vs Fox NewsNext Post
10 Monday AM Reads
I prefer wampum.
Unfortunately this is wrong. The Fed of course does spend by adding reserves to bank reserve accounts at the Fed. And reserves are referred to as base money. But reserves do not add to the money supply, at least the money that people and firms use to buy things in the economy. Banks use reserves to buy government debt, buy cash from the Treasury, settle transactions between banks, or loan reserves to banks who may need reserves. Banks do not lend reserves to people or firms. The total amount of reserves in the banking system is reduced or increased only by the government. But agent or entity can use reserves if they do not have an account at the Fed. The nation’s money supply almost all comes from credit formation such as bank lending. So the fed controls the price of money by setting interest rates but the people control the money supply by how much they borrow. That is why the Fed try to cool off the economy (by slowing don lending) by raising rates and to spur the economy (increased lending) by lowering rates.
The oil standard is working well for our friends in Moscow, not.
Gold supply would not be as volatile as petroleum.
wasn’t Germany’s problem the debt it owed to other countries after WW1?
Bingo!
“A gold standard ties the value of money to a country’s stock of gold reserves. While some argue that a gold standard can effectively maintain price stability over long periods, governments still have the ability to change their money supply and price level simply by changing the official gold-to-money ratio.”
—–Since governments (fed reserve) have the ability to devalue currency WITHOUT a standard, I don’t see this as a criticism.
“Moreover, a gold standard can be problematic because of sudden gold inflows and outflows that cause the supply of money, and therefore prices, to fluctuate.”
——And Quantitative easing doesn’t do this?
“In the end, a gold standard is not needed to preserve price stability as long as a country’s central bank is independent and has a clear mandate to achieve price stability.”
——Is this a joke?
No, not a joke. Reality. Your handle, however, is a joke, indicating that you are a modern day Know-Nothing.
John,
I understood that the banks set their own reserves, but the Fed sets the minimum. Reserves are set by the banks to cover their potential losses on loans on their portfolio that have become risky. The reserved amounts are charged to expenses, against income, and are tax deductible; therefore banks will maximize the deduction as long as the auditors wink, the IRS swallows, and more importantly if it does not hurt the income needed to meet forecast and good management performance.
What will happen to US world dominance, when China produces about double the amount of gold and Russia and Australia about the same amount, and Peru together with South Africa 50% more? Will the US$ dollar continue to be the world’s reserve currency? At current prices; how many dollars will be need to be printed to buy gold? How high was inflation in Spain as gold and silver from the colonies filled its coffers?
liber tea,
– – – If you were to read more slowly you will note that the point is well taken, as you can manage money the same way; whether you have a gold standard or not.; so what is the need of the standard?
– – – One can assume that it will be considerably easier, and under one’s control, to decide both the amount and the timing of the Quantitive Easing, as compared to controlling the in and out the flow of gold. Paper printing is easier than gold trading.
– – – It would be as much a joke if the central bank was not independent to set the US$/gold parity.
– – – Must keep in mind that just five, not all very friendly countries, produce about 4.5 times the amount of gold as the US. Easy to form a Gold OPEC to control the price and flow of gold. The US gold production amounts to about only 15% of world total gold production.
Liver Tea,
— The criticism is that with or without a gold standard you can change the price level or money supply;
so what is the need for a gold standard?
– – – Quantitive easing does that, but is easier to control a opposed to gold. Simply put, it is easier to print money than to trade in gold. China produces twice, Russia and Australia the same, and Peru and South Africa together 1.5 times the gold produced in the U.S. Not hard to form a GPEC, similar to OPEC to control price and quantity of gold. The US produces only about 15% of the world gold production. We should note that not all of those countries are particularly friendly. Will the US$ dollar dominance as a reserve currency survive ? Specially, if GPEC countries went to a gold standard?
— It would be a bigger joke if the central bank was not independent to set the US$ price of an oz.of gold.
In the 1920s the US was on the gold standard but in those days there was a credit bubble as well. But don’t tell the Austrians, because that’s something that doesn’t go down too well with the “Austrian School”.